Home » Discussion, Guest Post, Urban Redesign

Edmonton: It Does Not Suck!

17 January 2012 4 Comments

I remember one of the first things I noticed when I moved to Edmonton this past fall was a local interpretation written on a bench of the Van Morrison quote that said “Edmonton. Don’t like it? Get the fuck out”. That comment encapsulated the initial conversations I had with Edmontonians of various political and cultural stripes about urban planning in the city.  Edmonton is what it is. Edmonton is not meant to look good or sound exciting. Its purpose is to provide the basic necessities for the individual to prosper—at least financially. However as I learned more about my new home city, I realized Edmonton is a breeding ground for progressive ideas about ecologically sustainable living. As a new resident and urban planner, I would like to share with you my initial observations and suggestions about Edmonton’s land use patterns, built form, and transportation infrastructure. These observations are not based on much background research. I apologize in advance if I pass judgment without knowing the context.

As much as I’m impressed that Edmonton is a world leader in waste management, sadly, this efficient use of resources does not extend to land. Even though the City is about to proceed with its seemingly-radical redevelopment of the City Centre airport, relative to other Canadian cities I’ve visited, most of Edmonton’s lots are BIG and WIDE and very SPREAD OUT! The front and back yards are HUGE! City politicians approve new subdivisions light years away from downtown! I hope that as progressive planning practices become more common here, Edmonton’s lots will become narrower and shallower, and front-yard setbacks will be all but eliminated. The reductions in private green space would be replaced with high quality public parks and gathering spaces. I also hope that legislation similar to Ontario’s Places to Grow Act is implemented in Alberta to stop Edmonton’s sprawl no further than Anthony Henday Drive (though expensive gasoline may do to urban sprawl what a government might not be able to do).

While Edmonton’s built form seems to be generally limited to stucco bungalows and low-rise apartments, I see potential for new infill projects along back lanes. These humble corridors form a complete, alternative street network right in the city and will be the new frontier of residential and commercial intensification. I can imagine hundreds of thousands of people living in laneway housing and apartments as demand increases for small-scale living in urban areas and former streetcar suburbs. Other types of housing I’d like to see more of in Edmonton are row and semi-detached housing in both urban and suburban areas. As much as Edmonton’s roads are incredibly wide (lots of space to add bike and bus lanes), I also like the fact that all your streets are lined with a row of trees and a sidewalk on both sides forming a shaded canopy in the summer and letting through what little light exists in winter.

I am not impressed with Edmontonians’ insane addiction to their cars but am very impressed with the City’s commitment to correct this problem. I noticed the contra-flow bike lanes and plans for creating an accessible LRT network with low-floor boarding and frequent stops. I hope to see a bike-sharing network, a car-sharing network, and separated urban bike routes within a few years from now because active transportation (public transit, by bike, on foot, in a wheelchair) is an essential, efficient, and affordable transport philosophy for the 21st Century. I also hope to see the vast parking lots of the nightmare that is South Edmonton Common replaced with pedestrian-oriented, dense residential development. Finally, why is there a massive interchange in the middle of the fantastic river valley (next to the Muttart Conservatory)? That thing should go too!

From my initial observations, Edmonton has made some very bad planning mistakes but also some good decisions too. The city seems to be in the early stages of embracing the ecologically sustainable, resource-efficient lifestyle becoming popular worldwide that helps residents prosper with limited personal resources. Based on Toronto’s experience, this trend will accelerate as the suburbs are vacated by both young and old people fleeing the high cost of driving and home maintenance costs in favour of the city centre. I think that bench should read “Edmonton: Good things are coming. Stay the fuck here!”

 

Adam Bentley is an urban planner who recently moved to Edmonton to work for the provincial government. He will be contributing regular guest columns on planning public and private space in the Alberta Capital Region. You can find more of his work at adambentley.com.

Subscribe to the Charrette's Comment Feed

4 Comments »

  • Premee said:

    “I am not impressed with Edmontonians’ insane addiction to their cars ”

    Nope, me neither. I went without one as long as I could. But just try getting from A to B on transit sometime. :( I did a Google Maps transit search the other day to get somewhere just outside of the downtown core from my place in the northeast. 22 minutes by car; 1 hr 10 minutes by transit, and that assumed that I successfully made all my connections. I hope part of the City’s commitments to transit include desaturating the downtown area a little bit, and having more frequent bus service on major arterials (i.e. route-based transit rather than destination-based transit).

  • Adam Patterson said:

    This reminds me of Dan Burden – Creating Livable Communities

    by removing cars and creating accessible spaces for people you create value.

    http://www.adampatterson.ca/blog/2011/05/dan-burden-creating-livable-communities/

    My lot is 50feet wide and about 120 feet long, I don’t use the front yard all that much because its wide open to every one around me.

    My community also has alleys so naturally people have garages at the rear. Some houses also have front driveways. This to be is ridiculous because now the front streets have more cars in less space because no one wants to block their drive ways or block their second car.

    I commute to work year round and have a number of unfriendly road blocks in my way. The CN train yard being the larges. I can cross at 127th street or ride 30 blocks east and cross at 97th.

    Then I have the City center air port. I would love my commute to be more direct.

    The train yard to be is a bigger eye sore than anything else, Industrial areas rely less and less on train cargo and I think the lines should be moved.

  • Daveography.ca » Archive » Edmonton Does Not Suck (Or at Least Could Suck Less) said:

    [...] Charette has an excellent article today entitled Edmonton: It Does Not Suck!. It is well-written and reflects a lot of what I feel about Edmonton these [...]

  • britzkopf said:

    Good read, but i am curious about the seemingly contradictory implications that tree lined streets are great but property setbacks (which seem required for the former to exist) are sucky.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.